Foxy Brown Charges Dropped
September 27th 2006 03:10
Sorry guys, I haven’t blogged for a few days. Someone’s been a busy body. Now let’s forget about my hiatus and look at some juicy Foxy Brown news from yesterday.
As pointed out in this entry’s title, Foxy Brown is in legal troubles once again. Nothing new right? On the contrary; Foxy is actually found NOT guilty this time around. Before we look at it, let’s see what put her in the law’s bad books the first time.
In 2004, Foxy Brown gets into a fight with some workers at a nail salon over the price of a manicure. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again; petty, petty. After 2 years – in fact it ended just a month ago – Foxy pleads guilty to a charge of misdemeanor assault.
So a month after pleading guilty, she finds herself in the hot seat once again. This time a former consultant to Brown’s management company, Rasheeda Ellis, claims that when she tried to claim back pay from Brown, Foxy turns up at work with two beefy looking, big guys and makes threats to Ellis over a mobile phone.
That kind of defeats the purpose of having the big, beefy giants in the first place doesn’t it? How intimidating can muscle-bound lumps of flesh possibly be over a telephone conversation?
It seems all these run ins with the law are taking a toll on Foxy, who realizes what it’s doing to her public image. She looks even MORE gangsta. Now she’s a REAL rapper.
No I’m just kidding. Foxy is doing her best to keep a low profile during the Fiasco. She’s reported to ask the judge to disallow photos to be taken in court; a favour the judge would not make. Plus, she’s been hiding her face behind her shades throughout court hearings. Something the judge also didn’t appreciate and forced Brown to take off.
Maybe the judge is simple star struck. He or she might be such a huge fan of Foxy’s that he or she might just want to see the rapping nymph with his or her bare eyes.
…or maybe not.
Take care and peace out…
As pointed out in this entry’s title, Foxy Brown is in legal troubles once again. Nothing new right? On the contrary; Foxy is actually found NOT guilty this time around. Before we look at it, let’s see what put her in the law’s bad books the first time.
In 2004, Foxy Brown gets into a fight with some workers at a nail salon over the price of a manicure. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again; petty, petty. After 2 years – in fact it ended just a month ago – Foxy pleads guilty to a charge of misdemeanor assault.
So a month after pleading guilty, she finds herself in the hot seat once again. This time a former consultant to Brown’s management company, Rasheeda Ellis, claims that when she tried to claim back pay from Brown, Foxy turns up at work with two beefy looking, big guys and makes threats to Ellis over a mobile phone.
That kind of defeats the purpose of having the big, beefy giants in the first place doesn’t it? How intimidating can muscle-bound lumps of flesh possibly be over a telephone conversation?
It seems all these run ins with the law are taking a toll on Foxy, who realizes what it’s doing to her public image. She looks even MORE gangsta. Now she’s a REAL rapper.
No I’m just kidding. Foxy is doing her best to keep a low profile during the Fiasco. She’s reported to ask the judge to disallow photos to be taken in court; a favour the judge would not make. Plus, she’s been hiding her face behind her shades throughout court hearings. Something the judge also didn’t appreciate and forced Brown to take off.
Maybe the judge is simple star struck. He or she might be such a huge fan of Foxy’s that he or she might just want to see the rapping nymph with his or her bare eyes.
…or maybe not.
Take care and peace out…
| 48 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog











